<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Privacy advocates rejoice! or not&#8230;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogeuropa.eu/2006/06/13/privacy-advocates-rejoice-or-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogeuropa.eu/2006/06/13/privacy-advocates-rejoice-or-not/</link>
	<description>Ideas, debates, analysis et al.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 12:34:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tfserna</title>
		<link>http://blogeuropa.eu/2006/06/13/privacy-advocates-rejoice-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-862</link>
		<dc:creator>tfserna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 05:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogeuropa.eu/?p=30#comment-862</guid>
		<description>Many things in the EU seem to be &#039;just beginning&#039;... regardless of the amount of time and resources already devoted to them.

Sadly enough, and regarding the issue of privacy, it seems to me that we never left &#039;square one&#039;.

The European Commission needs to react as quickly as possible, and try to avoid unilateral agreements to be drafted, (not to mention signed!), by individual states that could be fearing air traffic to be interrupted from their territories to the US...

All the best, TFS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many things in the EU seem to be &#8216;just beginning&#8217;&#8230; regardless of the amount of time and resources already devoted to them.</p>
<p>Sadly enough, and regarding the issue of privacy, it seems to me that we never left &#8216;square one&#8217;.</p>
<p>The European Commission needs to react as quickly as possible, and try to avoid unilateral agreements to be drafted, (not to mention signed!), by individual states that could be fearing air traffic to be interrupted from their territories to the US&#8230;</p>
<p>All the best, TFS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMA</title>
		<link>http://blogeuropa.eu/2006/06/13/privacy-advocates-rejoice-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator>JMA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogeuropa.eu/?p=30#comment-861</guid>
		<description>as you know the European Commission has already announced a new decision on this matter, following the ECJ ruling on competences, so we are back to square one in a way. my impression is that the debate about privacy at the EU level (&quot;European privacy&quot;) is just beginning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as you know the European Commission has already announced a new decision on this matter, following the ECJ ruling on competences, so we are back to square one in a way. my impression is that the debate about privacy at the EU level (&#8220;European privacy&#8221;) is just beginning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
