<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BlogEuropa.eu &#187; Charlotte Leskinen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogeuropa.eu/category/charlotte-leskinen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogeuropa.eu</link>
	<description>Ideas, debates, analysis et al.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:56:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Appointing the new Commission: a call for less politics and more substance</title>
		<link>http://blogeuropa.eu/2010/01/21/appointing-the-new-commission-a-call-for-less-politics-and-more-substance/</link>
		<comments>http://blogeuropa.eu/2010/01/21/appointing-the-new-commission-a-call-for-less-politics-and-more-substance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IGC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlotte Leskinen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogeuropa.eu/?p=760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charlotte Leskinen January 21,  2010 On Tuesday, the Bulgarian Commissioner nominee, Rumiana Jeleva,  handed in her resignation letter. As a consequence, the vote to approve the new Commission has been postponed until February 9th in order to allow for the questioning of the new Bulgarian Commissioner nominee. The European Parliament has thus, for the second [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogeuropa.eu/2010/01/21/appointing-the-new-commission-a-call-for-less-politics-and-more-substance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ireland:  voting the “right” way</title>
		<link>http://blogeuropa.eu/2009/10/06/ireland-voting-the-%e2%80%9cright%e2%80%9d-way/</link>
		<comments>http://blogeuropa.eu/2009/10/06/ireland-voting-the-%e2%80%9cright%e2%80%9d-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 08:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IGC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlotte Leskinen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogeuropa.eu/?p=601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charlotte Leskinen October, 6 2009 On October 2nd the Irish went to the polls for a second time regarding the Treaty of Lisbon. This time the yes-side won with a convincing majority. However, one may ask is it legitimate to request a Member State to vote on the same issue until they get it “right”? [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogeuropa.eu/2009/10/06/ireland-voting-the-%e2%80%9cright%e2%80%9d-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Antitrust damages actions: recent developments</title>
		<link>http://blogeuropa.eu/2009/05/13/antitrust-damages-actions-recent-developments/</link>
		<comments>http://blogeuropa.eu/2009/05/13/antitrust-damages-actions-recent-developments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 11:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IGC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlotte Leskinen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogeuropa.eu/?p=503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charlotte Leskinen May 13, 2009 On March 26, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on the Commission White Paper on damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules. In general, the Parliament is favorable to the Commission’s proposals on enhancing private enforcement of EC competition law, but stresses that any Community measure “must not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogeuropa.eu/2009/05/13/antitrust-damages-actions-recent-developments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Class actions in Europe – the fear of the unknown?</title>
		<link>http://blogeuropa.eu/2008/12/12/class-actions-in-europe-%e2%80%93-the-fear-of-the-unknown/</link>
		<comments>http://blogeuropa.eu/2008/12/12/class-actions-in-europe-%e2%80%93-the-fear-of-the-unknown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IGC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlotte Leskinen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogeuropa.eu/?p=348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charlotte Leskinen December 12, 2008 Recently the European Commission published a Green Paper on Consumer Collective Redress which provides options for how to facilitate redress in situations where large numbers of consumers have been harmed by a single trader&#8217;s practice which is in breach of consumer law. A survey requested by Directorate-General for Health and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogeuropa.eu/2008/12/12/class-actions-in-europe-%e2%80%93-the-fear-of-the-unknown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The quest for a &#8220;Plan C&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blogeuropa.eu/2008/06/19/the-quest-for-a-plan-c/</link>
		<comments>http://blogeuropa.eu/2008/06/19/the-quest-for-a-plan-c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IGC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlotte Leskinen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogeuropa.eu/?p=183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charlotte Leskinen June 19, 2008 For the second time in the last three years, the European Union faces the challenge of finding a solution to an institutional crisis. In 2005, the European Constitution was rejected by the French and the Dutch, and last Thursday the Irish rejected the Treaty of Lisbon, a revised version of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogeuropa.eu/2008/06/19/the-quest-for-a-plan-c/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facilitating Compensation for Victims of Infringements of EC Antitrust Rules</title>
		<link>http://blogeuropa.eu/2008/04/10/facilitating-compensation-for-victims-of-infringements-of-ec-antitrust-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://blogeuropa.eu/2008/04/10/facilitating-compensation-for-victims-of-infringements-of-ec-antitrust-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IGC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlotte Leskinen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogeuropa.eu/2008/04/10/facilitating-compensation-for-victims-of-infringements-of-ec-antitrust-rules/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charlotte Leskinen April 10, 2008 Last week, the European Commission published its White Paper on Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules (available here). The principles of the White Paper are developed in more detail in the accompanying Commission Staff Working Paper (see here). The White Paper presents policy options and specific measures [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogeuropa.eu/2008/04/10/facilitating-compensation-for-victims-of-infringements-of-ec-antitrust-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Finland´s education scores are so high</title>
		<link>http://blogeuropa.eu/2007/12/14/why-finlands-educations-scores-are-so-high/</link>
		<comments>http://blogeuropa.eu/2007/12/14/why-finlands-educations-scores-are-so-high/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IGC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlotte Leskinen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogeuropa.eu/2007/12/14/why-finlands-educations-scores-are-so-high/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charlotte E. Leskinen December 14, 2007 Now that the last PISA results on Education have been published and as a product of the Finnish education system I’d like to offer a few, completely non-scientific, layman’s speculations on why the Finnish students traditionally score so high. PISA, the Programme for International Student Assessment coordinated by the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogeuropa.eu/2007/12/14/why-finlands-educations-scores-are-so-high/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Si hace 50 años no&#8230;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blogeuropa.eu/2007/02/21/si-hace-50-anos-no/</link>
		<comments>http://blogeuropa.eu/2007/02/21/si-hace-50-anos-no/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IGC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlotte Leskinen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogeuropa.eu/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charlotte Elisabeth Leskinen 21 de febrero, 2007 En su artículo “Si hace 50 años no…” en Foreign Policy José Ignacio Torreblanca se pregunta qué tipo de Unión Europea crearíamos si empezáramos hoy. En su opinión,el comienzo sería la identificación de las prioridades y los objetivos, luego se decidiría cómo tomar las decisiones para realizarlos y, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogeuropa.eu/2007/02/21/si-hace-50-anos-no/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

